Leave a Comment

Comments

1
Written by:Nathan
Posted on:May 12, 2008 at 3:46 pm

Couldn’t it be that the response is proof of how deeply rooted misogyny is in modern American culture??

2
Written by:McCue
Posted on:May 12, 2008 at 3:56 pm

I think the fatal flaw in any such argument is that GTAIV is completely awesome. Similarly awesome products include Iron Man, both Star Wars trilogies, the FA-22 Raptor, the fact that “300″ is based on a true story, and the concept of Rocky Balboa.

I am not really sure it is necessary to take an ideological stance on a video game, besides “this is sweet” or “this sucks.”

Also call me sometime to hang out, or else I am going to consider you representative of your gender and adopt a misogynist worldview based on that impression.

3
Written by:Sinker
Posted on:May 12, 2008 at 8:16 pm

Yay to distinguishing between fiction and reality! Long live killing pixelated prostitutes…

4
Written by:Cosmo
Posted on:May 12, 2008 at 8:18 pm

You really aren’t able to drive in any GTA game without running people over, prostitutes included.

5
Written by:kate
Posted on:May 13, 2008 at 8:51 am

@Nathan: Yes. And of course GTA demonstrates how deeply rooted misogyny is in modern American Culture, but it’s more of a mirror than a cause. Actually in that way, it’s maybe perhaps even *beneficial* to feminist causes, as it purports to be a sim of America. The fact that someone built that kind of misogyny into the game, means that it’s a problem, and gives it more exposure than it otherwise would have had.

@McCue: Right, they’re stories, they’re art and they’re comments on culture and the human imagination. I’m with you. And sure, let’s hang out.

@Sinker: Not really my point, but thanks for playing.

@Cosmo: It’s awesome that you’re *supposed* to run into people in GTA, since I really can’t play any kind of driving game without hitting things (see my record on Mario Kart).

6
Written by:rich
Posted on:May 29, 2008 at 12:12 pm

I don’t think prostitutes (or women in general) are specifically targeted as a hated group in the game, although they are part of the game. you really get to kill lots of different people, mostly men, of many ethnicities.

I recently played the game at a friend’s house (and some others like Call of Duty 4) and I agree that the game is art and definitely a significant comment on our culture and society. Also, the game’s production values are nothing if not excellent. But I must say that despite not being a violent person at all, you occasionally start seeing through the eyes of your player in real life. Walking across the street, you see a building that would be a good sniping spot or a good green area to create havoc with your stolen vehicle — if you were playing the game –. So despite the Harvard researcher’s study, I can see how some people can be pushed over the edge with a game like that and proceed to do a columbine or kill some prostitues.

hope everything is good. i’ll call you up when i’m the city…

7
Written by:Your Little Bro
Posted on:June 14, 2008 at 5:50 am

The beginning of this post reminds me of this…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi3erdgVVTw

And how deeply rooted is misogyny when the majority (if not all, I haven’t played GTA4 yet I am just comparing this to other GTA games) of people that you’re “supposed to kill” are men. I would say this is misandry instead. The choice is yours in the game to kill who you want. Maybe you are just playing out a Jack the Ripper fantasy?

Also a)are prostitutes the best representation of women? b) what about the other women that are killed? c)why focus on just prostitutes?